Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Harm, 340 P.3d 1110.

343 citing documents.

State v. Bradford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Bradford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
n.2, ¶ 2, n. 2 (App. 2015) ( ).
State v. Cope 387 P.3d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cope 387 P.3d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“We review de novo whether double jeopardy applies.” ¶ 15 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2002)).
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Alexander Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Alexander Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) (internal citation omitted).
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) (citations and quotations omitted).
State v. Hargett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hargett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bucholtz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bucholtz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Connatser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Connatser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Orner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Orner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Myers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, n.2 (App. 2015) (citation omitted).
Markham Contracting Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Co. 379 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Mullins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Guzman-Leal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mullins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Guzman-Leal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ( ).
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Durazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Forister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Durazo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Forister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
A horizontal gaze nystagmus test indicated Forister had a blood alcohol concentration 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016