Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Harm, 340 P.3d 1110.

343 citing documents.

State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Dwyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
With her feet protruding through the open door, Dwyer began honking the horn with her elbow, cursing, yelling for her mom and boyfriend, and reaching for 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Paskins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Paskins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
P. 20(a) requires the court to enter a judgment of acquittal “if there is no substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.” Substantial evidence is “such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 11 (App. 2015) (citation omitted).
State v. Mutuberria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mutuberria Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Substantial evidence is “such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” ¶ 11 (App. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Bibbins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bibbins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hoffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hoffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
at 606, 760 P.2d at 606, and the United States Supreme Court and Arizona Supreme Court have found that sentence enhancements do not violate double jeopardy, ¶ 23, (citing United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148, 154– 55 (1997)); -72, -81 (1980), superseded by statute, A.R.S.
State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Amador-Creane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Amador-Creane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Minjarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Minjarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Minjarez’s wallet contained another small plastic bag imprinted with a picture of “an old style cartoon bong, with a fuse on it, and then a repeating 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 23, (citing United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148, 154–55 (1997)); superseded by statute, A.R.S.
State v. Tonyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Tonyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Hannah 355 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hannah 355 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. McPherson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. McPherson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hulsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hulsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015