Cited by

See Trujillo, (court’s broad discretion cannot override defendant’s constitutional right not to be punished for exercising his or her rights).

-15, ¶ 12 (App. 2019) (Rules of Criminal Procedure); ¶ 4 (2017) (legal conclusions).

We review the superior court’s denial of a petition for PCR for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2020), but review the interpretation of the criminal rules and the court’s legal 2 STATE v. JUMPER Decision of the Court conclusions de novo, ¶ 12 (App. 2019); ¶ 4 (2017).

DISCUSSION ¶7 We review the superior court’s denial of a petition for PCR for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2020), but review the interpretation of the Criminal Rules de novo, ¶ 12 (App. 2019).

DISCUSSION ¶7 We review the superior court’s denial of a PCR petition for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2020), but review the interpretation of the Criminal Rules de novo, ¶ 12 (App. 2019).

DISCUSSION ¶9 We review the superior court’s denial of PCR for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2020), but review the interpretation of the Criminal Rules de novo, –15, ¶ 12 (App. 2019).

DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the superior court’s denial of PCR for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2020), but review the interpretation of the Criminal Rules de novo, –15, ¶ 12 (App. 2019).

–21, ¶ 34 (App. 2019) (recognizing that a court’s broad discretion in the sentencing sphere “cannot override the constitutional imperative that a defendant cannot be punished ‘because he has done what the law plainly allows him to do’”).