Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ramirez, 616 P.2d 924.

257 citing documents.

  • State v. Lerch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    P. 32.2(a)(3) (claims are waived if they are not brought in the first PCR proceeding); -68 (App. 1980) (court applied a waiver analysis to “issues first presented in a petition for review” because the superior court “obviously never” had the chance to consider the alleged errors meaningfully).
  • State v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (holding that the appellate court will not address arguments made for the first time in a petition for review); Ariz. R. Crim.
  • State v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Mayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    -68 (App. 1980) (applying a waiver analysis to “issues first presented in a petition for review” because the superior court “obviously never” had the opportunity to meaningfully consider the alleged errors); (applying waiver to claims that could “have been pr
  • State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    (precluding defendant from raising 3 STATE v. DIXSON Decision of the Court PCR issues for the first time on review).
  • State v. Parise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Parise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Stoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Stoner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Baltazar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Baltazar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (requiring review petitions to contain a statement of issues decided by the superior court); (reviewing courts do not address issues first raised in review petition).
  • State v. Blazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Blazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (petition for review must contain issues decided by the trial court that defendant is presenting for review); (this court does not address issues raised for the first time in a petition for review).
  • State v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    P. 33.16(c)(2)(B); -78 (App. 1991); (holding there is no review for fundamental error in a post-conviction relief proceeding); ¶¶ 40-42 (App. 2007) (same).
  • State v. Limehouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Limehouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (petition for review must contain issues decided by the superior court); (court of appeals does not address issues raised for the first time in a petition for review).
  • State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Edwards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (petition for review must contain issues decided by the trial court that the defendant is presenting for review); (court of appeals does not address issues raised for the first time in a petition for review).
  • State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    P. 32.1(e)(2); ¶ 9 (2016) (requiring petitioners to establish, inter alia, they were "diligent in discovering the facts and bringing them to the court's attention" when pursuing a newly-discovered-evidence claim (-53 (1989))); (directing petitioners to raise PCR issues first in the superior court).
  • State v. Lipsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Mattox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Mattox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Lipsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    (court of appeals reviews only issues raised in superior court).
  • State v. Bonney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Bonney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    (this court does not address issues raised for the first time in a petition for review).
  • State v. Phifer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Phifer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (limiting petition for review to “issues the trial court decided”)
  • State v. Murrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Murrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    P. 33.16(k) (describing appellate review as discretionary); (court of appeals does not address issues raised for the first time in a petition for review); ¶ 16(App. 2013) (failure to cite to relevant authority and to develop the argument waives claim on review); (insufficient
  • State v. Goc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021