Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Owen v. Blackhawk, 79 P.3d 667.
- Valenzuela v. Sedillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Valenzuela v. Sedillo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Owen v. 3 ¶ 9 (App. 2003); Woyton, 247 Ariz. at ¶¶ 8-10.
- Berk v. Dimarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Berk v. Dimarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Aguilar v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Aguilar v. Aguilar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Best Interests Finding ¶17 Mother argues that the family court erred because it did not specify which factors under A.R.S.
- McRae v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- McRae v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Thornburg v. Thornburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Thornburg v. Thornburg
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 15 (App. 2013) (); ¶ 16 (App. 2003) 1 Absent material changes from the relevant date, we cite a statute’s current version.
- Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Deluna v. Petitto 450 P.3d 1273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Deluna v. Petitto
450 P.3d 1273
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§§ 25-403, -408(G), (I); -22, ¶¶ 9-12 (App. 2003) (holding that although A.R.S.
- Johnson v. Malone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Johnson v. Malone
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
but there, unlike in this case, we were unable to assess whether the superior court focused unduly on one factor to the exclusion of others.
- Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Ward v. Ward
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Baker, 237 Ariz. at 116, ¶ 10; ¶ 7 (App. 2003).
- Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Lewis v. Rehkow
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 10 (App. 2015); ¶ 7 (App. 2003).
- Brittner v. Bullock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Brittner v. Bullock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Petrizze v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Petrizze v. Johnson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 25-403, -22, ¶ 12 (App. 2003) (holding court abused its discretion by modifying custody without making findings on the record); 2) lacks competent evidence supporting its decision, ¶ 5 (1999); or 3) “commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion,” Kohler v. Kohle
- Terrell v. Torres 438 P.3d 681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Terrell v. Torres
438 P.3d 681
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See, ¶¶ 22-23 (App. 2013) (remanding upon finding the trial court failed to properly consider father’s engagement and certain related evidence, with instructions to the trial court to give such evidence “full consideration”).
- Berrier v. Rountree 433 P.3d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Berrier v. Rountree
433 P.3d 8
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 25-408(G), (I) ; Murray v. Murray , , 177, ¶ 9, , 81 (App. 2016) ; Owen v. Blackhawk , , 421, ¶ 9, , 670 (App. 2003).
- Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Wright v. Wright
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 5 (App. 2016) ( ¶ 7 (App. 2003), ¶ 7 (App. 2008)).
- Brittany W., Ryan W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Brittany W., Ryan W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
We review the superior court’s determinations for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 7 (App. 2003), but review alleged constitutional violations de novo, ¶ 42 (2010).
- Heuchan v. Lipko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Heuchan v. Lipko
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
–21, ¶¶ 8–12 (App. 2003).
- French v. Morin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
French v. Morin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Although our statutes do not require that there be a showing of change in circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child in order to modify a custody decree, our case law does require such a showing.” ()); (court required to find material change before modifying custody order and parenting time but erred in finding evidence of material change based on mother’s intent to move out of state only if court permitted child to move).
- Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Robles v. Palencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Robles v. Palencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Bundy v. Alford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Bundy v. Alford
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–41, ¶ 43 (App. 2009); ¶ 7 (App. 2003); ¶ 6 (App. 2001).
- Dellaripa v. Dellaripa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Dellaripa v. Dellaripa
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 10 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 7 (App. 2003)).
- Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 7 (App. 2003) ( ¶ 3 (App. 2002)).