Cited by

This court defers to the superior court’s weighing of evidence and determinations of witness credibility, ¶ 49 (App. 2017), and will not reweigh credibility and conflicting evidence on appeal, ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

¶ 11 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

¶13 “An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision” or the court has committed an error of law “in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (noting we will not reweigh conflicting evidence); Miller, 245 Ariz. at 325, ¶ 9.

¶ 19 (App. 2009) (quotation omitted).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.”).

The request also is untimely, ARCAP 11(f), and the court denies the request to consider witness credibility, ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

–53, ¶¶ 20–26 (App. 2009).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (the credibility of witness testimony is for the superior court to determine).

¶ 14 (App. 2017); ¶ 16 (App. 2009).