Cited by

“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 10 (App. 2000); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“We must give due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses.”).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (noting that the trial court is in the best position to weigh the evidence and evaluate the parties’ credibility).

¶9 We will affirm if substantial evidence supports the court’s decision, ¶ 16 (App. 2009), and absent an abuse of discretion, will not substitute our opinion for that of the superior court

Nor has he shown that the court abused its discretion in weighing the evidence and determining credibility, ¶ 49 (App. 2017), particularly given that this court does not reweigh credibility and conflicting evidence on appeal, ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

We defer to the superior court’s credibility determinations.” ¶ 7 (App. 2021) ( ¶ 16 (App. 2009)).

This court defers to the superior court’s weighing of evidence and determinations of witness credibility, ¶ 49 (App. 2017), and will not reweigh credibility and conflicting evidence on appeal, ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

¶ 11 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

¶13 “An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision” or the court has committed an error of law “in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (internal quotations and citations omitted).