Cited by

“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

§ 25-403(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2009).

Because we lack appellate jurisdiction to review Father’s objections to the court’s decision, n.2, ¶ 9 (App. 2009), that portion of the appeal is dismissed, 5 C. Attorney Fees ¶8 Father argues the family court erred in denying his request for attorney fees, urging that Mother’s position throughout the proceedings was unreasonabl

–52, ¶¶ 11, 16, – 62 (App. 2009) (appellate court will not re-weigh conflicting evidence or re- determine preponderance of the evidence) (citations omitted).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 19 , (quoting State ex.

¶ 12, (recognizing that a finding of “significant domestic violence” pursuant to § 13-3601 precludes an award of joint legal decision-making under § 25-403.03(A)).

“A family court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, or making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support.” ¶ 8 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2008), ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

¶ 13, Hurd, ¶ 16, (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or re- determining the preponderance of the evidence.”).

n.3 (App. 2009) (holding that the appellate court does not address issues not properly raised on appeal).

However, we “defer to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” (“Even though conflicting evidence may exist, we affirm the trial court’s ruling if substantial evidence supports it.”).