Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hurd v. Hurd, 219 P.3d 258.

507 citing documents.

Thornburg v. Thornburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Vincent, 238 Ariz. at 155, ¶ 17 ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).
Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 5 (App. 2016); ¶ 16 (App. 2009).
Peter D. v. Geetika C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Peter D. v. Geetika C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“We must give due regard to the .
Deluna v. Petitto 450 P.3d 1273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Deluna v. Petitto 450 P.3d 1273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Faries v. Faries, II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Faries v. Faries, II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hernandez v. Fabian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Hernandez v. Fabian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Paredes-Gabriel v. Riva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Paredes-Gabriel v. Riva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
An abuse of discretion occurs “when the record is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support the decision,’ or when the court commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 4 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).
A. Espinoza v. M. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A. Espinoza v. M. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).
Petrizze v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Petrizze v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 25-403(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Quijada v. Quijada 437 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Quijada v. Quijada 437 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2015) ( ¶¶ 16, 19 (App. 2009), and Goats v. A. J. Bayless Mkts., Inc., ).
Wilson v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wilson v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Boyle, 231 Ariz. at 65-66, ¶¶ 8, 13 ( ¶ 15 (App. 1998), ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).
Downum v. Downum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Downum v. Downum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hieger v. Hieger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hieger v. Hieger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-54, ¶¶ 25-26 (App. 2009) (finding significance, and error, in the absence of findings related to several factors enumerated in A.R.S.
Durbin v. Keller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Durbin v. Keller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Herrera v. Rivero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 16 (App. 2009); ¶ 13 (App. 1998).
Ervin v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ervin v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 1998); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.” (citation omitted)).
Heuchan v. Lipko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Heuchan v. Lipko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 25-403(A), (B); ¶ 11 (App. 2009).
Strong v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Strong v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Engstrom v. McCarthy 411 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Engstrom v. McCarthy 411 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hurd v. Hurd , , 52, ¶ 19
McDonald v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McDonald v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review ¶15 We will affirm if substantial evidence supports the family court’s decision, ¶ 16 (App. 2009), and will not substitute our opinion for that of the family court unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion
Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017