Cited by

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.”).

We do not reweigh evidence on appeal, ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citation omitted), and the party who initially sought the protective order has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it should remain in effect.

Moreover, to the extent his due process argument asks that we reweigh the evidence, we do not do so on appeal, ¶ 16 (App. 2009), and realistically cannot do so without a transcript, see Romero v. Sw.

¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citation omitted) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.”).

¶12 We will affirm if substantial evidence supports the court’s decision, ¶ 16 (App. 2009), and will not substitute our opinion for that of the superior court unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion

ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review and Applicable Law ¶22 We will affirm if substantial evidence supports the court’s decision, ¶ 16 (App. 2009), and will not substitute our opinion for that of the superior court unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion

¶ 19 (App. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

¶ 16 (App. 2009).2 CONCLUSION ¶20 For these reasons, we affirm.

§ 25–403(B); ¶ 20 (App. 2009); ¶ 9 (App. 2003).

See Hurd 4 ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (an appellate court does not re- weigh conflicting evidence or re-determine preponderances of evidence).

A court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, ¶ 8 (App. 2008), or by making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support, ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (stating appellate court “must give due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses” and will not re-weigh conflicting evidence).

Husband also requests this Court to reweigh the evidence and find that “the evidence, when properly weighed, supports that Wife gifted the proceeds to Husband.” “Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence,” and we “must give due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

Vincent, 238 Ariz. at 155, ¶ 17 ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision,” or when the court commits “an error of law in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

¶6 In resolving a relocation request, the court must “make specific findings on the record as to all relevant factors and the reasons its decision is in the children’s best interests.” ¶ 20 (App. 2009).