Cited by

See Hurd 4 ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (an appellate court does not re- weigh conflicting evidence or re-determine preponderances of evidence).

A court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, ¶ 8 (App. 2008), or by making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support, ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (stating appellate court “must give due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses” and will not re-weigh conflicting evidence).

Husband also requests this Court to reweigh the evidence and find that “the evidence, when properly weighed, supports that Wife gifted the proceeds to Husband.” “Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence,” and we “must give due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

Vincent, 238 Ariz. at 155, ¶ 17 ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision,” or when the court commits “an error of law in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

¶6 In resolving a relocation request, the court must “make specific findings on the record as to all relevant factors and the reasons its decision is in the children’s best interests.” ¶ 20 (App. 2009).

§ 25-403(A), ¶ 11 (App. 2009), and make "specific findings on the record about all relevant factors and the reasons for which the decision is in the best interests of the child," A.R.S.

ke, ¶ 10 (2003); 3 As an additional sanction, the superior court referred Bruno to the State Bar of Arizona “for appropriate disciplinary action.” 8 BERG, et al. v. WEISS & MOY, ¶ 19 (App. 2011); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (deferring to the superior court’s credibility determinations).

ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review and Applicable Law ¶21 We will affirm if substantial evidence supports the family court’s decision, ¶ 16 (App. 2009), and will not substitute our opinion for that of the family court unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion

¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Abuse of discretion exists “when the record is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support the decision,’ or when the court commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 4 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

¶ 16 (App. 2009); Denise R. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

¶ 16 (App. 2009); (the superior court has broad discretion to determine parenting time because it is in the best position to determine the parenting measures that are in a child’s best interests).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (“Our duty on review does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or redetermining the preponderance of the evidence.”).