Cited by

¶ 17 (App. 2009) (“The issues raised in Mother’s cross-appeal all seek an enlargement of her rights .

¶ 17 (App. 2009) (“The issues raised in Mother’s cross-appeal all seek an enlargement of her rights .

“We review de novo the trial court’s interpretation of the [Child Support] Guidelines.” ¶ 21 (App. 2009).

¶ 15 n. 2 (App. 2009) (recognizing that motions to strike are “not properly used to voice objection to the content of a court order,” and should be restricted to the “narrow purpose articulated in the rules”).

¶¶ 40–41 (App. 2009); ¶ 16 (App. 2001).

§ 25–320; Guidelines § I1; ¶ 8 (App. 2015), and to establish consistent child support standards that adapt to the children’s needs and their parents’ ability to pay, ¶ 38 (App. 2009).

Performance Funding, ¶ 5 (App. 2000) ( ¶ 13 (App. 2009)).

§ 25-320 app. § 5(E) (“If income is attributed to the parent receiving child support, appropriate childcare expenses may also be attributed.”); -11, ¶¶ 22, 24 (App. 2009).