Cited by

¶ 17 (App. 2009) (“[S]tandard principles of statutory construction require that we do not judicially impose a requirement the legislature has intentionally chosen not to require.”).

§ 25-411(J) is limited to placing conditions on the exercise of parenting time, such as supervision or geographical restrictions.”) ( ¶ 16 (App. 2009)).

§ 25-411(J) for the proposition that a family court may “sua sponte restrict a parent’s parenting time rights” upon finding that such parenting time would endanger the physical, mental, moral, or emotional health of the minor.

(we presume trial court knows and follows law).

§ 25-411(J), in the absence of a proper request for findings of fact and conclusions of law under Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 82(A), the family court need not make specific findings that it has reached such a conclusion in order to restrict parenting time, ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (comparing the requirement that a best interests finding be specified on the record according to A.R.S.

¶ 18 (App. 2009) (stating that in the absence of record evidence to the contrary, trial judges are presumed to know and correctly apply the law).

-87, ¶¶ 9-14 (App. 2009).

¶ 8 (App. 2009); ¶ 7 (App. 2003).

¶ 10 , (court will not read limitation into statute when legislature has chosen not to include limitation); ¶ 17 , (“[Sjtandard principles of statutory construction require that we do not judicially impose a requirement the legislature has intentionally chosen not to require.”).

“[Standard principles of statutory construction require that we do not judicially impose a requirement the legislature has intentionally chosen not to require.” ¶ 17 , .