Cited by

¶ 62 (App. 2009); ---, ¶ 8 (App. 2022); ¶ 24 (2017) (noting that courts hold unrepresented litigants to the same standards as attorneys).

–27, ¶ 13 (App. 2000) (explaining issues raised for first time on appeal are generally waived); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (explaining failure to develop argument with citation to record and legal authority can lead to waiver).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”); see also ARCAP 13(a) (outlining requirements for opening briefs).

See ARCAP 13(a)(5), (7) (appellate brief shall contain citations of legal authorities and references to the record in support of recitation of facts and argument); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to comply with Rule 13 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure can constitute waiver of that claim); ¶ 13 (App. 2008) (self-representing parties “are entitled to no more consideration than if they had been represented by

¶ 62 (App. 2009); ARCAP 13(a)(7).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”) (citation omitted).

And though we may assume Plaintiffs have waived their arguments, ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to properly develop argument on appeal results in waiver), we exercise our discretion to consider and reject them.

¶ 62 (App. 2009); ARCAP 13(a)(7).

Ct. 106(A) (applying ARCAP 13 to juvenile appeals); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (holding that failure to comply with ARCAP 13 can constitute waiver of that claim).

¶ 45 (App. 2009) (applying abuse of discretion standard for trial court’s exclusion of evidence based on lack of foundation).

She argues we should dismiss his appeal, treat his arguments as waived, see, ¶ 62 (App. 2009), or strike and disregard all noncompliant portions of his brief, see, e.g., Flood Control Dist.

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting that arguments may be waived by failure to provide citation to authorities and the record).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (stating an opening brief “must contain” each of the appellant’s “contentions concerning each issue presented for review, with supporting reasons for each contention, and with citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies”); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (explaining the failure to develop and support an argument on appeal results in waiver of the issue); ¶ 25 n.5 (App. 2000) (holding issues raised for the first time

See ARCAP 13(a)(6)–(7); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

See ARCAP 13(a)(6); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (observing that appellant is required “to provide ‘citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on[]’ [and] [f]ailure to do so can constitute abandonment and waiver of that claim.” ( ¶ 101 n.9 (2004)).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to present significant arguments in opening brief can result in waiver of issue on appeal).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting that a party’s failure to present significant arguments on a particular issue may constitute abandonment and waiver of that issue).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).