Cited by

DISCUSSION ¶7 An appellate brief “must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.” ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to develop argument on appeal results in waiver).

¶ 51 (App. 2009) (noting that counsel’s failure to object to an argument at trial generally waives the issue on appeal).

See Ritchie v. Krasner , , 305, ¶ 62, , 1289 (App. 2009).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

App. P. 13(a); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting such failure “can constitute abandonment and waiver of [a] claim”).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (An appellant waives his claim by failing to provide significant arguments, supporting authority, and citations to the record in the opening brief).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”); ARCAP 13(a)(6), (7)(A).

See ARCAP 13(a)(5), (7); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting that such failure “can constitute abandonment and waiver of [a] claim” (citation omitted)).

The elements of negligence, other than the existence of a duty, which is a question of law, are factual issues “generally within the province of the jury.” ¶ 11 (App. 2009); ¶ 10 (2007) (“Whether the defendant has met the standard of care—that is, whether there has been a breach of duty—is an issue of fact that turns on the specifics of the individual case.”).

“The trial court has wide discretion in deciding whether to exclude evidence of prior convictions because its prejudicial effect is greater than the probativeness on lack of credibility, and the exercise of this discretion should not be disturbed absent a clear showing of abuse.” ¶ 46 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”); ARCAP 13(a)(6), (7)(A).

¶ 62 (App. 2009); Modular Sys., ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question”); ARCAP 13(a)(7).

See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., n.5, ¶ 12 (App. 2017) (stating waiver for failure to comply with ARCAP 13(a) is discretionary); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (requiring that opening briefs present and address significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth the parties’ position on issues in question).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”).

-04, ¶ 54, -88 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

Id.; ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (holding that failure to support arguments with legal authority may constitute waiver and abandonment of that claim) ( n.9, ¶ 101 (2004)).

(addressing merits of waived issue partially “in the interests of judicial economy”); , (addressing merits of issue not raised below partially because ap-pellee had not argued waiver).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (holding the failure to comply with ARCAP 13 can constitute waiver of that claim).

Id.; ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (holding that failure to support 3 CARAVETTA v. DUICK, et al. Decision of the Court Pursuant to A.R.S.