Cited by

Grp., LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2010) (“Fashioning an equitable remedy is within the trial court’s discretion, and it will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse thereof.”).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 9 (App. 2010).

Grp., LLC, (courts respect corporate form except when disregarding form is necessary to prevent fraud or injustice and entity is person’s alter ego).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (explaining that a legal remedy will bar a claim for unjust enrichment only if it is against the same defendant).

Group, LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2010) (“Fashioning an equitable remedy is within the trial court’s discretion.”).

¶31 Lastly, the Eisens argue that the above analysis, finding justification for any enrichment derived by DACC from Clint’s loan, contradicts this court’s determinations in Loiselle v. Cosas Management Group, LLC

Grp., LLC, ¶ 30 (App. 2010)).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 30 (App. 2010).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 9 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 9 (App. 2010) (“Unjust enrichment occurs when one party has and retains money or benefits that in justice and equity belong to another.”) (citation omitted).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 30 (App. 2010).

Group, LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2010).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (internal citations omitted).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 10 (App. 2010) (fact that defendant "committed no tortious or wrongful act" and "had no knowledge" of third party's wrongful acts did not "preclude [plaintiffs] from recovering on their unjust enrichment claim").

Grp., LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2010); Richardson v. City of Rutland, 164 Vt. 422, 427, 671 A.2d 1245, 1249 (1995)).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

Group, LLC, ¶ 8 (App. 2010) (“Fashioning an equitable remedy is within the trial court’s discretion, and it will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse thereof.”).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 14, (noting that the “doctrine that equity will grant no relief when there is an adequate remedy at law is limited to cases in which there is an adequate legal remedy against the defendants that are before the court.”).

Group, LLC, ¶ 8, Murdock-Bryant Const., (citation omitted).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 9, (quotations and citations omitted).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 8 , Richardson v. City of Rutland, 164 Vt. 422, 427 , 671 A.2d 1245, 1249 (1995)).

Grp., LLC, ¶ 8 , (“Fashioning an equitable remedy is within the trial court’s discretion, and it will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse thereof.”); see also Richardson v. City of Rutland, 164 Vt. 422 , 671 A.2d 1245, 1249 (1995) (“Courts have ‘a wide range of discretion’ to mold equita