Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ezell v. Quon, 233 P.3d 645.

116 citing documents.

Conklin v. Medtronic 418 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Conklin v. Medtronic 418 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Moreover, although the Conklins did not allege an “evil mind,” “[c]laims for punitive damages carry no special pleading requirements[.]” ¶ 23 (App. 2010).
Canyon v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Canyon v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
On June 25, 2015, a process server filed a certificate of service stating that he had posted a copy of the summons, complaint, and the court’s order approving alternative service on the front 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling on a motion to set aside a default judgment.” ¶ 2 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).
Dcb v. Foreman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dcb v. Foreman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
National v. Rico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
National v. Rico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
We review the denial of a Rule 60(c) motion for abuse of discretion, ¶ 15 (App. 2010), and will affirm the trial court’s ruling unless “undisputed facts and circumstances require a contrary ruling.”
Hahne v. Az Air Time Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hahne v. Az Air Time Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In the ruling, the court found that there was “no 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling on a motion to set aside a default judgment.” ¶ 2
Baron v. Dillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Baron v. Dillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Aea v. T&K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aea v. T&K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lanza v. Holladay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lanza v. Holladay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
¶¶ 29-31, (“[T]he request must state the claimed basis for the award.”).
Arizona State University ex rel. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement System 349 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Arizona State University ex rel. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement System 349 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 41 , (discussing this canon of construction).
Sportway v. Livin Da Dream Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sportway v. Livin Da Dream Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling on the motion to set aside the default judgment.” ¶ 2, (internal citations omitted).
Washington v. Pellerito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Washington v. Pellerito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
¶12 Moreover, we disagree with appellants that Blum’s request for attorney fees was untimely because “Blum did not generally make a fee request post-judgment, much less a request that stated the legal basis for a request.” In support of this argument
Branigan v. Fredrickson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Branigan v. Fredrickson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Emerman v. Az Holding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Emerman v. Az Holding Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Mashni v. Foster 323 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mashni v. Foster 323 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
STANT v. CITY OF MARICOPA EMPLOYEE MERIT BOARD 319 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
STANT v. CITY OF MARICOPA EMPLOYEE MERIT BOARD 319 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Parkway Bank & Trust Co. v. Zivkovic 304 P.3d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Parkway Bank & Trust Co. v. Zivkovic 304 P.3d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(internal quotation omitted).
In Re the Marriage of Kassa 299 P.3d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In Re the Marriage of Kassa 299 P.3d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
A “general request that [a party] be awarded attorneys’ fees does not constitute a claim ‘pursuant to statute, decisional law or contract[.]’” quoting Rule 21(c)(1).
Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of America 293 P.3d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of America 293 P.3d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Moreno v. Silva 296 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Moreno v. Silva 296 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
We also note that our dissenting colleague, in footnote 3, infra, references this writer’s , but does not fully describe the Ezell dissent.