Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Ezell v. Quon, 233 P.3d 645.
- Moreno v. Silva 296 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
Moreno v. Silva
296 P.3d 91
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
We also note that our dissenting colleague, in footnote 3, infra, references this writer’s , but does not fully describe the Ezell dissent.
- Johnson v. Gravino 293 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Johnson v. Gravino 293 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- Bys Inc. v. Smoudi 269 P.3d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Bys Inc. v. Smoudi
269 P.3d 1197
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
¶ 15 , (citing State ex.
- Williams v. Williams 264 P.3d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Williams v. Williams
264 P.3d 870
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 41 , (Gemmill, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part) (applying principle of “expressio unius est exelusio alterius”).
- Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Sherman 260 P.3d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Sherman 260 P.3d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Nolan v. Kenner 250 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Nolan v. Kenner 250 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
Blair v. Burgener
245 P.3d 898
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Facts and Procedure ¶2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling on a motion to set aside a default judgment.”