Cited by

P. 11(b); –54 ¶¶ 29–32 (App. 2011) (sanctioning counsel for misrepresenting the record and relying on inappropriate legal authorities).

P. 11(b); -54, ¶¶ 29-32 (App. 2011) (sanctioning counsel for misrepresenting the record and relying on inappropriate legal authorities).

–47 (App. 1978); ¶ 26 (App. 2011).

-53 ¶¶ 25-28 (App. 2011).

P. 11(a); -54, ¶¶ 29-32 (App. 2011) 7 WASHBURN v. HOUSTON Decision of the Court (sanctioning counsel for misrepresenting the record and relying on inappropriate legal authorities).

P. 11(a); –54, ¶¶ 29–32 (App. 2011) (sanctioning counsel for misrepresenting the record and relying on inappropriate legal authorities).

See, e.g., City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409, 436 (2015) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (referring to “prostitution of underage girls”); ¶ 11 (App. 2018) (addressing child prostitution statute); ¶ 10 (App. 2011) (noting “illegal pornography sites that appeared to depict violence against underage girls”); ¶ 27 (App. 2008) (referencing “underage girls” in the context of the crime of sexual conduct with a minor).

(modification); ¶ 26 (App. 2011) (fees).

¶ 6 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 26 (App. 2011)).

See Mangan v. Mangan , , ¶ 26

¶ 6 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 26 (App. 2011)).