Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Duckstein v. Wolf, 282 P.3d 428.
- Soto v. Umom New Day Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Nava-Amaya v. Horstman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Murray v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Nava-Amaya v. Horstman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Murray v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Eggert v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Eggert v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Campbell v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Campbell v. Campbell
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 8 (App. 2012); ¶ 4 (App. 2007).
- Verdugo v. Hon Lang Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Verdugo v. Hon Lang Aguilar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Maricopa, ¶ 9 (App. 2020); ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Swanson v. Swanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Arapaho v. Searle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Arapaho v. Searle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Montes v. Montes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Montes v. Montes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Ali v. Ali 509 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Ali v. Ali
509 P.3d 410
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 8 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 4 (App. 2008)).
- Van Camp v. Van Camp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Van Camp v. Van Camp
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 8 (App. 2012); ¶ 5 (App. 2019).
- Danko v. Dumas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Danko v. Dumas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Reyes v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Reyes v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Jorgenson v. Giannecchini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Jorgenson v. Giannecchini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Conroy v. hutchinson/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Conroy v. hutchinson/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Wilson v. Howard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Wilson v. Howard
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION ¶9 This court reviews de novo whether due process was adequate, -69 (App. 2018), and how to interpret court rules, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).
- Ridenour v. Drury Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Ridenour v. Drury
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶11 This court reviews a superior court’s decision “to hold an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.” –34, ¶ 19 (App. 2012).
- Clayton v. Hon. Kenworthy 475 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Clayton v. Hon. Kenworthy 475 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Williamson v. Williamson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Williamson v. Williamson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Cavness v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Cavness v. Wilson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-233 ¶¶ 13-16 (2012) (holding lack of verification for petition for dissolution was a procedural defect and did not deprive the superior court of jurisdiction).
- Hanger v. Hanger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Hanger v. Hanger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Schreiner v. Schreiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Schreiner v. Schreiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Cohen v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- US Bank v. Kurtz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
US Bank v. Kurtz
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 15 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 9 (App. 2018), ¶ 19 (App. 2012)).
- Colby v. Colby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Colby v. Colby
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 8 (App. 2012); (“A judgment .
- Amedovski v. Amedovski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019