Cited by

Ruffino, 245 Ariz. at 169 ¶ 11; Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.

Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., see Ruffino, 245 Ariz. at 169 ¶ 14.

See Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., (“A quitclaim deed conveys no greater rights to the property than those possessed by the grantor.”).

And the affidavit cannot rely on conclusory statements but must include “facts indicating [the party] made a due diligent effort to locate an opposing party.” Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.

• On page 17, the brief contains a fabricated quotation purportedly from Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., though the case does not concern the proposition asserted.

See Miller v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, ¶ 9 (App. 2011); Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., Ariz. Bd.

And, importantly here, that right may persist even after a tax lien foreclosure judgment has been entered if that judgment is flawed: a judgment that is void on its face due to lack of jurisdiction is “a legal nullity” that “cannot operate to foreclose a party’s right to redeem.”

Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., (–23 (1963) ).

P. 4.1(n) (2012).1 ¶11 “Before resorting to service by publication,” however, the movant must “file an affidavit setting forth facts indicating it made a due diligent effort to locate an opposing party to effect personal service.” Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.

¶18 Although we found that Raven and Bingham had constructive notice of Hodges’ interest in the property and were not bona fide purchasers, the lawyers for Raven and Bingham argue they had objective probable cause to bring the claim based on the facts of Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., P.2d 395 (App. 1990).

See Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., , (declining to apply § 74 because it "specifically excludes §§ 65 and 66 dealing with default judgments”).

P. 4.1(n) (“party or officer making seiviee shall file an affidavit showing the manner and dates of the publication and mailing, and the circumstances warranting the utilization of the procedure”); Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc., , (before seiviee by publication, party must file “affidavit setting forth facts indicating it made a due diligent effort to locate an opposing party to effect personal service”).

Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC, , , Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.

¶7 Citing Sprang v. Peterson Lumber, Inc., P.2d 395 (App. 1990), the trial court stated that “a finding of due diligence prior to service by publication is a jurisdictional prerequisite.” The court found that Barlage had produced evidence that, “even if [he] had conducted a due diligence search and set forth those facts in [his] affidavit, [he] likely

Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.