Cited by

Corp., (unless evidence is “part of the record before the trial court at the time it considered the motion for .

Corp., (“If the opposing party fails to present, either by affidavit or other competent evidence, facts which controvert the moving party’s affidavits, the facts alleged by the moving party may be considered as true.”).

Corp., cf. also Bennett v. Pima County Community College District, 2 CA-CV 2016-0019, 2016 WL 6406435, at *5, ¶¶ 22, 25 (Ariz. App. Oct.

Corp., -5 (App. 1990); see also In re Ests.

Corp., (“As a general rule, an unsworn and unproven 2 Specifically, Defendants alleged that Dion grabbed Cervantes by the arm in which the officer was holding his service weapon and pulled his arm forward.

Corp., (An appellate court’s review is limited to the evidence before the superior court.).

Corp., -5 (App. 1990) (noting that appellate court will not grant relief on claims that are based on evidence not part of the record on appeal).

Corp., (affirming summary judgment where the non-moving party’s affidavit in opposition to the motion did not “controvert the prima facie showing established in the affidavits supporting” the moving party’s motion, and the non-moving party’s “written response” to the motion “contains unsworn, unproven, and som

Corp., –5 (App. 1990) (stating evidence not considered by superior court may not be newly considered on appeal).

Corp., (noting appellate court review is "limited to the record before the trial court").

Corp., ("An appellate court's review is limited to the record before the trial court.").

Corp., (holding that an affidavit could establish damages for summary judgment when it was based in part on review of admissible business records).

Corp., -5 (App. 1990).2 Mother also cannot 1Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes and rules cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated.

Corp., –5 (App. 1990) (evidence not considered by trial court may not be considered by appellate court).