Cited by

Corp., (stating that this Court is “limited to the record before the trial court”).

Corp., (appellate review is limited to evidence presented at trial).

Corp., (citation omitted).

Corp., ("An appellate court's review is limited to the record before the trial court.").

Mortgage Corp., -5 (App. 1990).

Corp., (“If the opposing party fails to present, either by affidavit or other competent evidence, facts which controvert the moving party’s affidavits, the facts alleged by the moving party may be considered as true.”).

Corp., (on appeal, materials not in the record before the superior court will not be considered).

Corp., by way of specific statements of fact supported by citations to the record, see Rule 56(c)(3)(B).

Corp., (“An appellate court’s review is limited to the record before the trial court.”).

Corp., (“An appellate court’s review is limited to the record before the trial court.”) ( ).

Corp., (appellate court will not consider evidence not first presented to trial court).

Corp., –6 (App. 1990) (after party moving for summary judgment submits facts sufficient to show existence of no genuine issue of material fact, party opposing motion must present "competent material" sufficient in response).

Corp., (App. 1 The Association’s damage itemizations were not accompanied by a foundational affidavit.

Corp., (if party opposing summary judgment fails to present, either by affidavit or other competent evidence, facts that controvert moving party’s affidavits, the facts alleged by the moving party may be considered true).

Corp., and we view the facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.

Corp., (if party opposing summary judgment fails to present affidavits or evidence controverting moving party’s filings, facts alleged by movant may be unfamiliar with the existing version of Rule 56(f).

Corp., - 8 (App. 1990) (citing Koven v. Saberdyne Sys., Inc., ).