Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp., 795 P.2d 827.

182 citing documents.

Maassen v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Maassen v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Prescott v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Prescott v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mortgage Corp., -5, -31 (App. 1990).
State v. Cifuno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cifuno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Corp., (stating the appellate review is limited to the record before the trial court).
Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Reade v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Corp., (in summary judgment context, opposing party’s failure to provide 4The agent also noted the FBI considered information about the equipment exempt from the federal Freedom of Information Act, citing 5 U.S.C.
Reade v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp., -5, -31 (App. 1990).
Lanza v. Holladay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lanza v. Holladay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Acarta v. Partridge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Acarta v. Partridge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp., (opposing party’s failure to present facts controverting the moving party’s affidavits permits the trial court to accept facts alleged by moving party as true).
Langendorf v. Buckeye Water Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Langendorf v. Buckeye Water Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp., (opposing party’s failure to present facts controverting the moving party’s affidavits permits the trial court to accept facts alleged by moving party as true).
Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Iknadosian v. Mahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cooper v. Motta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Iknadosian v. Mahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cooper v. Motta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
nur/ibrahim v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
nur/ibrahim v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Corp., (“[U]nless the deposition transcripts were part of the record before the trial court at the time it considered the motion for partial summary judgment, we cannot consider them on appeal.”).
Cooper v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cooper v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Corp., (“[U]nless the deposition transcripts were part of the record before the trial court at the time it considered the motion for partial summary judgment, we cannot consider them on appeal.”).
Next Gen Capital, LLC v. Consumer Lending Associates LLC 316 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Next Gen Capital, LLC v. Consumer Lending Associates LLC 316 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Mortgage Corp., , (holding that an uncontradicted affidavit describing the plaintiffs efforts to mitigate discharged the movant’s burden and supported the grant of summary judgment); , *13 (granting summary judgment based upon un
Yanni, Thompson, Gunderson, Sayegh v. Tucker Plumbing, Inc., Brewer Enterprises, Inc. 312 P.3d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Yanni, Thompson, Gunderson, Sayegh v. Tucker Plumbing, Inc., Brewer Enterprises, Inc. 312 P.3d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Caruthers v. Underhill 287 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Caruthers v. Underhill 287 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Grande v. Jennings 278 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Grande v. Jennings 278 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Corp., , (citations omitted).
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Mortgage Corp., -5 , -31 (App.1990) (noting that appellate review is limited to the record before the trial court).
Vig v. Nix Project II Partnership 212 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Vig v. Nix Project II Partnership 212 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Carter 165 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Carter 165 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Mortgage Corp., , Benitez v. Indus.
Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc. 156 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc. 156 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re One Residence at 319 E. Fairgrounds Dr. 71 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In Re One Residence at 319 E. Fairgrounds Dr. 71 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Mortgage Corp., (party opposing summary judgment motion has burden to demonstrate existence of issue of fact).