DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Schabel v. DEER VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL, 920 P.2d 41.

97 citing documents.

  • Toliver v. US Bank National Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Canon v. Retail Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Sarbu v. Vertullo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Jones v. Cohen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Allison Bradford; Michael Carlson and Adrian Wurr v. City of Tucson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
  • Colorado City v. Centennial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Danam v. Gcu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    No. 97, (holding issues not argued in a party’s appellate brief waived).
  • Potter v. Ehrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Murtagian v. Entity Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    No. 97, ("Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party's appellate brief are waived.").
  • Rynn v. Uhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    No. 97, (noting that arguments not clearly raised in a party’s appellate brief are waived on appeal).
  • Talking Rock v. Inscription Canyon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    No. 97, (issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived).
  • Gabriel Garibay v. Hon. Kellie Johnson William Fox, Az Constable Ethics Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
  • State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Jessyca P., Devon J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    No. 97, ("Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party's appellate brief are waived.").
  • Aow v. Scythian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    No. 97, ("Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party's appellate brief are waived.").
  • Robinson v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Marcie a Redgrave v. Doug Ducey 493 P.3d 878 Ariz. 2021
    No. 97, –64 (App. 1996) (same); –33 (App. 1994) (same).
  • Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Carpenter v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    No. 97, (emphasis added).
  • Drh Enterprises v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”) (emphasis added).
  • Camboni v. Brnovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Glendale v. Viste Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Tourtillot v. Yuma County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Barkley v. Icep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    No. 97, (explaining that issues not adequately argued in an appellate brief are waived).
  • Atkins v. Snell & Wilmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Baize v. movado/western Claims Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Jasso v. Jasso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Westover v. Wees Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”) (citations omitted).
  • Compassionate Care Dispensary, Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs. 418 P.3d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    No. 97 , , 167, , 47 (App. 1996) ("Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party's appellate brief are waived.") (citations omitted); see also MT Builders, L.L.C. v. Fisher Roofing, Inc. , , 304 n.7, ¶ 19, , 765 n.7 (App. 2008) (deeming waived arguments raised "without any analysis").
  • Harding v. Sternsher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.” (citations omitted)); ¶ 91, (“We will not consider arguments made for the first time in a reply brief.” (citation omitted)).
  • Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson 390 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
    No. 97, , 167, , 47 (App. 1996) (issues not clearly raised in appellate brief waived).
  • Unted v. Gammage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Banda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    No. 97, 4 ¶9 Banda also failed to provide this court a transcript of the evidentiary hearing, which constitutes another form of waiver.
  • Atr v. Cec Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    No. 97, (noting issues not clearly raised and argued in appellate brief are waived).
  • Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    No. 97, (citations omitted) (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Scottsdale v. Fortiff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Tatman v. pavestone/liberty Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.” (citations omitted)).
  • State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    No. 97, ); (“Issues not clearly raised and argued on appeal are waived.”) ().
  • Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.” (citations omitted)).
  • Glasser v. M&O Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    No. 97, (issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived).
  • Jonathan L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party's appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety 352 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2015
  • Fleming v. State Department of Public Safety 352 P.3d 446 Ariz. 2015
    No. 97, ); see also Glazer, 237 Ariz. at 163 ¶ 12, 347 P.3d at 1144 (“Because § 12-820.03 bars recovery against public entities if the defense is proven, we construe it narrowly.”); Doe ex rel.
  • Frazer v. Frazzano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Arner v. Ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    :ama Ariz. 161, 167, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.”).
  • Tavilla v. Blue Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are waived.” ( )).
  • Stratton v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    No. 97, (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief are deemed waived.”).