Cited by

¶8 We review both evidentiary rulings and denial of a mistrial for abuse of discretion and “will not reverse unless unfair prejudice resulted or the court incorrectly applied the law.” ¶ 6 (App. 2000) (citation modified)

see also Taylor v. State Farm Mut.

¶13 This court reviews rulings on the admission of evidence for an abuse of discretion and will reverse if “unfair prejudice resulted” or “the court incorrectly applied the law.” ¶ 6 (App. 2000) (citing cases).

We will not reverse a denial of a motion for new trial “unless the record and circumstances show it was a manifest abuse of discretion.” ¶ 27 (App. 2000).

We review evidentiary rulings for an “abuse of discretion” and “will not reverse unless unfair prejudice resulted or the court incorrectly applied the law.” (citation omitted).

-44, ¶¶ 19-21, 24, 26 (App. 2000).

to support their contention that Hoff was required to offer “expert evidence” to establish that her medical bills were reasonable.

DISCUSSION ¶5 We review the superior court’s rulings on the admissibility of evidence for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 5 (App. 2018), and will not reverse unless the court incorrectly applied the law, resulting in unfair prejudice, ¶ 6 (App. 2000)

“[W]e give great deference to the jury’s factual findings.” ¶ 27 (App. 2000).

We review the admissibility of evidence for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 6 (App. 2000), and Father has shown no such abuse.

“[W]e give great deference to the jury’s factual findings.” ¶ 27 (App. 5 SYNERGY, et al. v. SINGH, et al. Decision of the Court 2000).

¶ 14 (App. 2013); ¶ 6 (App. 2000).

v. Claassen, ¶ 8 (App. 2015); ¶ 27 (App. 2000).

or the court incorrectly applied the law,” ¶6 (App. 2000) (citation omitted).

See 4 ¶ 6 (App. 2000) (as amended).

¶11 A tort plaintiff is only entitled to recover “those damages which are the direct and proximate consequence of the defendant’s 3 PINO-ALVAREZ v. ERLICHMAN Decision of the Court wrongful acts.” ¶ 28 (2000) (quoting Valley Nat’l ).

-44, ¶¶ 19-24 (App. 2000) (“To be relevant, .

“We review the trial court’s evidentiary rulings for a clear abuse of discretion; we will not reverse unless unfair prejudice resulted, or the court incorrectly applied the law.” ¶ 6 (App. 2000) (citations omitted).

¶ 6 (App. 2000) (this court reviews evidentiary rulings for a clear abuse of discretion).