Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re the Appeal in Yuma County Juvenile Court Action Number J-87-119, 779 P.2d 1276.

25 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.F. and S.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Ct. Action No. J- 87-119
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to B.W. Ariz. 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to B.W. Ariz. 2025
Ct. Action No. J-87-119, –40 (App. 1989) (finding no just cause for father failing to maintain a normal parenting relationship even though mother hid child and severed ties where father made no effort to find the child), cited with approval in Action No. S-114487, 179 Ariz. at 99; cf. Minh T. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ct. Action No. J-87-119, see also Maricopa Cnty.
Caterina W. v. Anthony R., S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Caterina W. v. Anthony R., S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Juvenile Court Action No. J-87-119, (internal citation omitted).
Michael M. v. Katie A., E.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael M. v. Katie A., E.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Court Action No. J-87-119
Jeremy v. v. Judith H., K.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jeremy v. v. Judith H., K.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Court Action No. J-87-119, (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Autumn R. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Autumn R. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juvenile Court Action No. J- 87-119
William W. v. Brooke S., P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
William W. v. Brooke S., P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Ct. Action No. J-87- 119, the juvenile court here did not base its decision solely on failure to pay child support.
Calvin B. v. Brittany B. 304 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calvin B. v. Brittany B. 304 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Pima Cty. Juv. Severance Action 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
In finding abandonment, the court held: [C]ommon sense suggests that a person in this father’s shoes who really intended to maintain a relationship with his son would have done more than this father did to try to find his child Even if every allowance is made for lack of sophistication and limited resources, the trial court was not compelled to believe that the father was actually stymied— , (emphasis added).
Matter of Pima Cty. Juv. Severance Action 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 804 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1990
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 804 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1990
For example, in Juvenile Action No. J-87-119, , although the father did not know the whereabouts of the mother and child, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s termination order.
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2710 790 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2710 790 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Yuma County Juvenile Court Action Number J-87-119