Cited by

Sec., –79, ¶¶ 13–18 (App. 2014) (to avoid waiver, party must raise a timely objection if she believes services are inadequate).

Sec., 179, ¶¶ 3, 20 (App. 2014), and when there is evidence that a parent's unfitness "detrimentally affects the child's well-being" despite "the provision of services by [DCS]," Pima Cnty.

Sec., –79 ¶ 16 (App. 2014); Bennigno R. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

Sec., ¶¶ 17–18 (App. 2014) (It is “incumbent on [a parent] to promptly bring [his] concerns to the attention of the juvenile court, thereby giving that court a reasonable opportunity to address the matter.”).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2014) (holding a parent may waive concerns about services if not timely raised in superior court).

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (a parent who does not raise the issue in the superior court is precluded from challenging that finding on appeal).

Sec., –79, ¶¶ 10–18 (App. 2014).

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (a parent who does not raise the issue of services in the superior court is precluded from challenging that finding on appeal).

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (parents must voice their concerns about services to the juvenile court in a timely manner); ¶ 2 (App. 2001) (even constitutional arguments can be waived if not presented to the juvenile court).

Sec., 178–79, ¶¶ 10, 16 (App. 2014) (arguments not raised in the juvenile court are generally waived on appeal); ¶ 2 (App. 2001) (even constitutional arguments can be 2 Given Father’s failure to appear at the pretrial conference, he “is deemed to have admitted the allegations”

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (holding that “a parent who does not object” to the services provided is precluded from challenging a severance order’s reasonable-efforts finding).

Sec., ¶ 20 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶¶ 17–18 (App. 2014) (applying waiver when parent failed to raise service issues during review hearings or at the time of the termination trial).

Sec., ¶ 1 (App. 2014); Romero v. Sw.

Sec., -79, ¶ 16 (App. 2014).