DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Crystal E. v. Department of Child Safety, 390 P.3d 1222.

220 citing documents.

  • Morgan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Fateama M. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Tiffany L., Gregory C. v. Dcs, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Fateama M. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (“By failing to challenge the time-in-care ground, Mother has abandoned and waived any contention that the court erred in granting severance on that basis.”).
  • Morgan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Crystal E. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Tiffany L., Gregory C. v. Dcs, P.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Michael A. v. Elizabeth G., M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Michael A. v. Elizabeth G., M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 4 (App. 2017).
  • Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (holding a parent’s failure to challenge termination on a specific statutory ground constitutes abandonment and waiver of that issue on appeal) (citations omitted).6 II.
  • Jerica S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Jerica S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017); see also Michelle M. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 6 (App. 2017) (“Mother does not challenge the finding that DCS proved both statutory grounds for severance, meaning those issues are waived.”).
  • Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 4 (App. 2017).
  • Miriam F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Miriam F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Crystal E. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    –78, ¶¶ 5–8 (App. 2017).
  • Lourdes R. v. Robert O., A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Lourdes R. v. Robert O., A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 4 (App. 2017).
  • Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    § 8-533(B)(4), and thus has waived and abandoned any contention that the court erred in granting severance on this basis, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) ( and Christina G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
  • Tiffani G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Tiffani G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Edan A. v. Dcs, A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Edan A. v. Dcs, A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Amanda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Amanda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Kyle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Kyle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    –78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (this court can affirm a severance on any one of the grounds found by the superior court).
  • Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Stephanie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Stephanie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Shirley R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Juan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Juan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Selena T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Selena T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Ruben M., 230 Ariz. at 241, ¶ 25 (we only require the findings of fact and conclusions of law to be “sufficiently specific to enable the appellate court to provide effective review”); –78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (this court can affirm a severance on any one of the grounds found by the superior court).
  • Alan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    § 8-537(B); ¶ 5 (App. 2017).
  • Melissa M. v. Dcs, J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Melissa M. v. Dcs, J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (“By failing to challenge the time-in-care ground, [m]other has abandoned and waived any contention that the court erred in granting severance on that basis.”).
  • Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶¶ 5-8 (App. 2017).
  • Jessica M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Leo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Leo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 8 (App. 2017) (explaining that “our review should be confined to the issues raised by the appellant”).
  • Jessica M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶¶ 5-8 (App. 2017).
  • Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (holding that parent’s failure to challenge time-in-care finding constituted abandonment and waived “any contention that the court erred in granting severance on that basis.”).