Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Miller, 321 P.3d 454.

58 citing documents.

State v. James Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. James Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Riehle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Riehle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 24 (App. 2014) (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593– 94 (1993)).
State v. Bierbrodt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bierbrodt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 25 (App. 2014) (quoting Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 141–42 (1999)).
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Kelly 545 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Kelly 545 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
McAlister v. Loeb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
McAlister v. Loeb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Marinakis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Marinakis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 47 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Waterford v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Waterford v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 23 (App. 2014) (“While the expert’s methodology must be based on more than speculation, its reliability need not be established to a degree of scientific certainty.”).
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
– 304, ¶¶ 16–54 (App. 2014).
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Conner 467 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Conner 467 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Mendoza v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Mendoza v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 47 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
State v. Rael Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re: Ms2009-000010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re: Ms2009-000010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 20 (App. 2014) (“[C]ross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate 4 IN RE: MS2009-000010 Decision of the Court means of
State v. Rael Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 61 (App. 2014) (holding retrograde extrapolation evidence admissible).
Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Santos v. Trolley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Santos v. Trolley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fleck v. Antti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fleck v. Antti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 15 (App. 2014) ("An appellate court 'will not disturb a trial court's rulings on the admission .
State v. Kavu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kavu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lehn v. Al-Thanayyan 438 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lehn v. Al-Thanayyan 438 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fisk v. Hurricane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Fisk v. Hurricane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Arpaio v. Hines Gs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Arpaio v. Hines Gs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 21 (App. 2014) (“’Expert testimony which does not relate to any issue in the case is not relevant and, ergo, non-helpful.’” (quoting 4 ARPAIO, et al. v. HINES GS, et al. Decision of the Court Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm.
Engstrom v. McCarthy 411 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Engstrom v. McCarthy 411 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Montgomery v. Miller , , 299, ¶ 25
State v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hunter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017