Cited by

Garr, 234 Ariz. at 544, ¶ 5 (questions of law); ¶ 11 (App. 2018) (rules and statutes).

¶ 22 (App. 2018) (“An Order of Protection that is affirmed after a hearing at which both parties had an opportunity to appear is a final, appealable order.” (cleaned up)) (citing Ariz. R. Protective Order P. 42(a)(2)); Ariz. R. Protective Order P. 42(a)(2) (“An Order of Protection .

Law P. 5(a)(4); ¶ 16 (App. 2018).

(court considers “each word and phrase” in interpreting statute and will not make any part of statute superfluous); (court construes related statutes together).

“Because neither cites authority to support the request, neither is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees.” ¶ 23 (App. 2018).

§ 25-411; ¶ 20 (App. 2018).

§ 12–144(D); n.5 ¶ 19 (App. 2018).

¶ 22 (App. 2018) (A superior court judge cannot review or change a final judgment regarding a protective order once the judgment has become final.)

However, it is well-settled that a “superior court judge cannot review or change the judgment of another superior court judge [once] the judgment has become ‘final.’” ¶ 22 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 11 (App. 1999)).

¶7 In support of his argument, ¶ 10 (App. 2018), which explained “the interplay between the procedural rules and statutes governing 3 GRAVES v. SLAWSON Decision of the Court protective orders and family law proceedings.” In Vera, we held that when a

¶ 6, n.1 (App. 2018) (court may take judicial notice of related superior court records)

See Ariz. Const. art. VI, § 31(B); ¶ 19 n.5 (App. 2018).

See Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 31(B); ¶ 19, n.5 (App. 2018).

-36, ¶¶ 20- 22 (App. 2018).