Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance, 647 P.2d 1127.

415 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Ramirez 840 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
In Re the Marriage of Ramirez 840 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Rules 8(d) and 12(i), Ariz.R.Civ.P., 16 A.R.S.; , , cert.
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 838 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1992
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 838 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1992
Thomas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 842 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Thomas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 842 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Co., , (emphasis in original); see also ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified Sch.
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co. 828 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co. 828 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Greves v. Ohio State Life Insurance 821 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Greves v. Ohio State Life Insurance 821 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Stewart v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance 817 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Stewart v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance 817 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. New England Reinsurance Co. 815 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1991
Fremont Indemnity Co. v. New England Reinsurance Co. 815 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1991
Co., , (quoting Federal Ins.
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 813 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 813 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
re to pay a claim without a reasonable basis for such action constitutes a breach of the implied duty of good faith); , (tort of bad faith arises “when an insurance company intentionally denies, fails to process, or fails to pay a claim without a reasonable basis for such action”); , , cert.
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 813 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1991
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 813 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1991
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 799 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 799 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Co., , for the proposition that attorney’s fees are awardable under A.R.S.
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 798 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Millar v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 804 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Millar v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 804 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 792 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1990
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 792 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1990
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
That [Barker] was retained by Michael Trauscht to try the captioned matter; that it was understood and agreed at that time that at such time as the case was won, there would be filed with the court an application for attorneys’ fees on an hourly basis, same to be awarded in the court’s discretion at a reasonable rate, all in accordance with Sparks v. Republican [sic] National Life Insurance Co., , [sic] (1982)
Dodge v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. 778 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1989
Dodge v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. 778 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1989
Co., , we held that “an action alleging insurer’s bad faith is one ‘arising out of a contract’ within the meaning of § 12-341.01.” Because we reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, plaintiffs are the “successful parties” on this appeal under A.R.S.
Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe 773 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe 773 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Sletten v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 780 P.2d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Sletten v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 780 P.2d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Taylor v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 778 P.2d 1328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Taylor v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 778 P.2d 1328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Co., -41 , , 1138-39 cert.
Gibbons v. Chavez 770 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Gibbons v. Chavez 770 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dimmer 773 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988