Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance, 647 P.2d 1127.

415 citing documents.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dimmer 773 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Co., , our supreme court held that fees may be awarded under the statute where a single act constitutes both a tort and a breach of contract, “as long as the ' cause of action in tort could not exist but for the breach of contract.” Id.
Oldenburger v. Del E. Webb Development Co. 765 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 761 P.2d 1019 Ariz. 1988
Oldenburger v. Del E. Webb Development Co. 765 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 761 P.2d 1019 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
See, -39 , -37 (bad faith consists of denying claim without reasonable grounds), cert.
Curran v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 752 P.2d 523 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Curran v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 752 P.2d 523 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Porter v. Continental Casualty Co. 753 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Porter v. Continental Casualty Co. 753 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
He contends first that neither the certificate of insurance nor the booklet which Motorola gave its employees accurately sets forth the contents of the language in the master policy, , , cert.
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc. 747 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1987
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc. 747 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1987
Co., , permit *514 ted recovery of attorneys’ fees here.
ARIZ. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. v. Dailey 751 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Dailey 751 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
ARIZ. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. v. Dailey 751 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Dailey 751 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
“In determining whether ambiguity exists in a policy, language should be examined from the viewpoint of one not trained in the law or the insurance business.” , cert.
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co., , the Arizona Supreme Court decided one of the leading cases addressing the attorneys’ fees issue.
Marcus v. Fox 747 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Marcus v. Fox 747 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1987
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1987
(“other insurance” clause unenforceable because it defeated the insured’s reasonable expectations); , (as a matter of law, pamphlet given to insureds before they purchased insurance created expectations of coverage), cert.
Reed v. Reed 740 P.2d 963 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Reed v. Reed 740 P.2d 963 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co. 737 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co. 737 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1987
DeTemple v. Southern Insurance 740 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
DeTemple v. Southern Insurance 740 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Arizona Farmworkers Union v. Whitewing Ranch Management, Inc. 744 P.2d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Arizona Farmworkers Union v. Whitewing Ranch Management, Inc. 744 P.2d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n 730 P.2d 204 Ariz. 1987
Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n 730 P.2d 204 Ariz. 1987
See McReynolds, 115 Ariz. at 171 , 564 P.2d at 394 ; United States Smelting, Refining & (actual motive in interfering with contract is a question of fact); , (insurer’s belief that insured’s claim was “fairly debatable” is a question of fact), cert.
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , and Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co.
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986