Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc., 717 P.2d 434.

149 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Marcos Isaac Danner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Marcos Isaac Danner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Veach v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Veach v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. 2025
State of Arizona v. Albert F. Vergara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. 2025
State of Arizona v. Albert F. Vergara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Freight System, Inc., Vergara argues Gum and Aguilar “failed to recognize .
Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra Canale 565 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra Canale 565 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Freight Sys., Inc., (recognizing that rights “are expectant when they depend upon the continued existence of the present condition of things until the happening of some future event” and “are contingent when they are only to come into existence on an event or condition which may not happen” (quoting Steinfeld v. Nielsen, 15 A
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flanigan v. Arizona registrar/r&c Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Freight Sys., Inc., – 40 (1986); (Civil statutes “may not be applied retroactively in the absence of a specific provision to that effect.
State v. Mauceli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mauceli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Freight Sys., Inc., –40 (1986).
Normandin v. Encanto 425 P.3d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Normandin v. Encanto 425 P.3d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Freight System, Inc., ).
Robert W. Baird & Co. v. Whitten 418 P.3d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Robert W. Baird & Co. v. Whitten 418 P.3d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Freight Sys., Inc. , , 140, , 444 (1986), superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized by State Comp.
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Freight Sys., Inc., , Thurston, 179 Ariz. at 50-51 , 876 P.2d at 546-47 .
Franklin v. Clemett 382 P.3d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Franklin v. Clemett 382 P.3d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Freight Sys., Inc., - 33, -37 (1986).
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Freight System, Inc., –40 (1986).
City of Apache Junction v. Doolittle 345 P.3d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
City of Apache Junction v. Doolittle 345 P.3d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Freight Sys., Inc., , (“[Rights] are expectant when they depend upon the continued existence of the present condition of things until the happening of some future event.
Hon. Fields v. Elected Officials Retirement Ariz. 2014
Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 320 P.3d 1160 Ariz. 2014
Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 320 P.3d 1160 Ariz. 2014
Freight System, Inc., ).
Hon. Fields v. Elected Officials Retirement Ariz. 2014
Freight System, Inc., ).
State v. Bolding 253 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Bolding 253 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Freight Sys., Inc., -32, 138-40 , -36, 442-44 (1986) (distinguishing accrual from vesting of right; concluding defendant had no vested right in substantive law existing at time of event forming basis for action but inchoate right because statute eliminating contributory negligence as bar to tort recovery and adopting
ARIZONA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION v. Brewer 243 P.3d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
ARIZONA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION v. Brewer 243 P.3d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Freight Sys., , ); , 568 n. 4, ¶ 34, , 1187 n. 4 (App.2005) (reasoning that a taxpayer does not have a vested right in a tax code provision).
STATE COMPENSATION FUND OF ARIZONA v. Fink 233 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
STATE COMPENSATION FUND OF ARIZONA v. Fink 233 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Freight Sys., Inc., , -01 , -22 (App.1990)).
Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 211 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 211 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Freight Sys., Inc., , (explaining that substantive rights may not be impaired once vested), superseded, -01 , -22 (App.1990).
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 196 P.3d 222 Ariz. 2008
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 196 P.3d 222 Ariz. 2008
DeVries v. State 198 P.3d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
DeVries v. State 198 P.3d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Freight Sys., Inc., , ( , ))).
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Freight Sys., Inc., -40 , -44 (1986).
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Freight Sys., Inc., -40 , -44 (1986).
State v. Gum 153 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Gum 153 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Freight System, Inc., -40 , -44 (1986), superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized in Dykeman ex rel.
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Reinstein 150 P.3d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Reinstein 150 P.3d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by