Miller v. Uhrick
Cited by
- State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Delinquency of M.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Gosney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- In Re Delinquency of C.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- State v. Bilducia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
- In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Fell 115 P.3d 594 Ariz. 2005
- State v. Wagner 976 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
- State v. House 821 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- State v. Watton 793 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1990
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Sanson v. Gonzales 141 Ariz. 633
- Miller v. Uhrick 146 Ariz. 413
Opinion text
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice. We granted review in this case to resolve an issue which evaded our review in Sanson v. Gonzales, 141 Ariz. 633 , 688 P.2d 641 (1984). The issue is presented again in this case: What is the effect of a clause which provides for nonwaiver of time is of the essence provision in a deed of trust when the holder accepts late payments? The resolution of the above issue by Division II of the Court of Appeals in this case is consistent with the views of this court, and we, therefore, approve the decision, Clayton K. Miller III v. Susan Uhrick, 146 Ariz. 413 , 706 P.2d 739 (App.1985). GORDON, Vice Chief Justice, and HAYS, CAMERON and FELDMAN, JJ., concur.