Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., 202 P.3d 536.

54 citing documents.

DAVIS v. PRESCOTT Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
DAVIS v. PRESCOTT Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009).
ANDRICH v. THRASHER Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
ANDRICH v. THRASHER Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009).
Nicaise v. ades/sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Nicaise v. ades/sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2009) ("In the absence of express findings, we may deem any necessary findings implied in the judgment."); ("This Court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the de
Beaumont v. Beaumont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Beaumont v. Beaumont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2009) (“In reviewing a trial court’s decision to deny attorney fees, we view the record in the light most favorable to sustaining that decision and will uphold the court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous.”).
Rogut v. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Rogut v. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Co., ¶ 15 (App. 2009) (quoting McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009)).
Laney v. Springerville Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Laney v. Springerville Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See Osuna v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., ¶ 11 n.4 (App. 2007) (declining to adopt a rule that jurisdiction vests in dismissal without prejudice when claims are otherwise time barred because the statute of limitations is not jurisdictional, can be waived, and the court would be “rais[ing] an affirmative defense on a defendant’s behalf”); McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009) (dismissing appeal when appellants did “not argue the statute of limitations barred the refiling of any of the cl
Salinas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Salinas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 10 (App. 2009) (finding claims had not been "finally resolved" when the court dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice).
Sipolt Marketing v. Non Profit Patient Center Inc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sipolt Marketing v. Non Profit Patient Center Inc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co., ¶ 15 (2009); McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009).1 Similarly, courts have held that the provision provides appellate jurisdiction over dismissals without prejudice based on a forum-selection clause.
McDaniel v. Banes 471 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
McDaniel v. Banes 471 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2009).
Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC 424 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC 424 P.3d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. , , 74, ¶ 4, , 539 (App. 2009).
Willis v. Dentists Benefits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Willis v. Dentists Benefits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In an order dated August 31, 2016, Department M of this court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction “as to all issues other than the vexatious litigant order.” See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009) (citation omitted) (holding that a dismissal without prejudice is not a final appealable judgment).
Romero v. Hasan 388 P.3d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Romero v. Hasan 388 P.3d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶8 A statute’s language is “the most reliable evidence of its intent.” McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 8, ( ).
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc. 382 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In contrast, an order dismissing without prejudice is not a final judgment because the plaintiff can refile the action and therefore “ha[s] nothing to appeal.” Osuna v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., quoting Mesa v. United States, 61 F.3d 20, 21 (11th Cir. 1995); see McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc.
Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC 380 P.3d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Zarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC 380 P.3d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See, e.g., Kool Radiators, , 534 ¶ 8, (noting dismissal without prejudice that does not preclude further litigation “is not a final, appealable order”) (citing cases); McMurray v. Dream *433 Catcher USA, Inc., , 74 ¶ 4, (noting dismissal without prejudice, where no claim was made that “the statute of limitations barred the refiling of any of the claims,” is “not a final judgment”) (citing cases); see also supra n.12.
State v. Zarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
23 BRUMETT v. MGA HOME Opinion of the Court without prejudice that does not preclude further litigation “is not a final, appealable order”) (citing cases); McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶4 (App.2009) (noting dismissal without prejudice, where no claim was made that “the statute of limitations barred the refiling of any of the claims,” is “not a final judgment”) (citing cases); see also supra n.12.
Mary Anna Sotomayor v. Pauline Sotomayor-Munoz 370 P.3d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Mary Anna Sotomayor v. Pauline Sotomayor-Munoz 370 P.3d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., (“this court has an independent duty to determine whether it has jurisdiction over an appeal”).
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc.
Az Public v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Az Public v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 2 (App. 2009).
Valencia v. Bp Capital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Valencia v. Bp Capital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2009).
KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. Evans 278 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. Evans 278 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 , (citing L.B.
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 12
Dos Picos Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pima County 240 P.3d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Dos Picos Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pima County 240 P.3d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., , -40 (App.2009), quoting Burke v. Ariz. State Ret.
Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF Arizona 239 P.3d 733 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF Arizona 239 P.3d 733 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 14 In general, “an appeal lies only from a final judgment.” McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., ¶ 4 , (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
Robinson v. Kay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Robinson v. Kay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Discussion ¶4 Although neither party has raised the issue, we have an independent obligation in every appeal to ensure we have jurisdiction, McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc., and we must dismiss an appeal over which we lack jurisdiction
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc.