Cited by

perior court had “an obligation to equitably divide clearly identified community property.” ¶15 The superior court’s ruling will be affirmed if there is substantial evidence in the record supporting that ruling, ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citing cases), and this court accepts the superior court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, ¶ 16 (App. 2011) (citing cases).

An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” ¶ 16 (2011) (holding that this Court will affirm an attorney’s fees award unless the record supports no reasonable basis).

While we generally will uphold such a ruling “if there is any reasonable basis for it,” ¶ 20 (App. 2011) (citation modified), when a party requests specific findings of fact and conclusions of law before trial, see Ariz. R. Fam.

“We review a trial court’s findings of fact for abuse of discretion and reverse only when clearly erroneous.”

-56, ¶ 18 (App. 2004) (citation omitted); ¶ 21 (App. 2011) (citation omitted) (holding that although the court did not discuss the evidence in detail, “we presume it fully considered the relevant evidence”).

We review an award of attorney fees for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 6 (App. 2014) (citation omitted), and will not reverse the award “if there is any reasonable basis for it.” ¶ 20 (App. 2011) (cleaned up).

¶7 We review an attorney’s fees award for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 6 (App. 2004), and will not reverse the award “if there is any reasonable basis for it.” ¶ 20 (App. 2011) (quotation omitted).

The court has the discretion to award attorney’s fees, and we will affirm “if there is any reasonable basis for [the award].” ¶ 20 (App. 2011) (quotations omitted).

at 52 ¶ 16, and this court accepts the superior court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, ¶ 16 (App. 2011).

(We will “affirm the trial court if its ruling was correct for any reason.”); (“[W]e must presume the trial court found the necessary facts to support its judgment, providing there is evidence in the record to support it.”).

-07 ¶¶ 6-8 (App. 2011) (citing authority).

We review a court’s factual findings for an abuse of discretion and “reverse only when clearly erroneous.” ¶ 6 (App. 2011).

We will uphold an attorney’s fees award “if there is any reasonable basis for it.” ¶ 20 (App. 2011) (quotation omitted).

¶ 2 (App. 2005); ¶ 9 (App. 2016); ¶ 18 (App. 2011) (“The presence of contrary facts does not render a trial court’s factual determinations clearly erroneous.”).

6 HOVDA v. HOVDA Decision of the Court ¶20 Although the superior court did not explicitly consider Wife’s circumstances in its ruling, “we will affirm the trial court if its ruling was correct for any reason.” ¶ 16 (App. 2011).

§ 25-324 for an abuse of discretion “and reverse only when clearly erroneous.” ¶ 6 (App. 2011); ¶ 8 (App. 2014) (division of property); ¶ 11 (App. 2010) (factual determinations); ¶ 20 (App. 2016) (attorney’s fees).

But “[e]ven when the technical requirements for preclusion based on a former adjudication are met, the court should not apply preclusion principles where there is some overriding consideration of fairness to a litigant.” ¶ 6 (App. 2011) (citation and quotation marks omitted).