Cited by

“[This Court] view[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s findings and will uphold them unless they are clearly erroneous or unsupported by the evidence.” ¶ 2 (App. 2011) (quotation omitted).

¶ 7 (App. 2011); see also Ariz. R. Fam.

¶ 7 (App. 2011); ¶ 6 (App. 2010); ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (“The trial court’s apportionment of community property will not be disturbed on appeal absent abuse of discretion.”).

to modify or terminate.”) (emphasis added); ¶ 13 (App. 2011).

¶ 13 (App. 2011) (discussing § 25-327(A)).

Law P. 91(A), (H) (delineating procedural requirements for a party seeking post-decree relief); ¶ 7 (App. 2011).

¶ 7 (App. 2011) ( (App. 3 MCCLENDON v. MCCLENDON Opinion of the Court 1995)).

¶ 7 (App. 2011) ( (App. 8 RAZDAN v. RAZDAN Decision of the Court 1995)); ¶ 8 (App. 2010) (

¶ 7 (App. 2011) (spousal support) (); ¶ 10 (App. 2015) (parenting time) ( ¶ 7 (App. 2003)); ¶ 8 (App. 2007) (child support) (citing Litt

Law P. 91(A), (H); ¶ 7 (App. 2011).

1 “We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s findings.” ¶ 2, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

(affirming trial court’s consideration of such benefits in modifying spousal maintenance).

CRSC, the tax-free benefit available to combat-disabled veterans that Husband elected to receive, is found not in Title 38 of the United States Code but in Title 10, titled “Armed Forces,” in chapter 71, titled “Computation of Retired Pay.” ¶ 26 In , we addressed this issue in the context of A.R.S.