Cited by

DISCUSSION ¶4 This Court views the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the decree, ¶ 2 (App. 2016), and “defer[s] to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

¶ 5 (App. 2016); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (appellate court will affirm if “substantial evidence” supports trial court’s ruling).

¶ 5 (App. 2016) (citing cases).

§ 25-213(A); ¶ 4 (App. 2019) ( ¶ 6 (App. 2016)) (construing similar legal presumption created by A.R.S.

¶ 5 (App. 2016) (citation omitted).

But the statutory presumption that all property acquired during the marriage is community property is both “fundamental to Arizona community property law,” and “strong,” ¶ 9 (App. 2016) ().

See generally ¶ 6 (App. 2016) (parallel community- property statute, A.R.S.

DISCUSSION ¶6 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the decree, ¶ 2 (App. 2016), and we defer to the superior court’s determination of witness credibility.

To overcome the presumption, the spouse maintaining the property is separate “has the burden of establishing the separate character of the property by clear and convincing evidence.” ¶ 9 (App. 2016) (citations omitted).

-02, ¶¶ 10-12 (App. 2016) (concluding the family court did not err in rejecting evidence offered by Husband that he inherited guns from his brother).

¶ 2 (App. 2016) (citation omitted); ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citations omitted).