Cited by

"A court abuses its discretion when its ruling is 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.'" ¶ 31 (App. 2017) (quoting Torres ex rel.

Declining to set a purge amount, the court ordered that in the event Husband “fail[ed] to pay the amounts ordered, [Wife] may offset the amounts owed” from Husband’s “share of the sale of the marital property and the refinancing of the [commercial] building.” ¶56 Although this court lacks jurisdiction over a civil contempt adjudication on direct review, ¶ 16 (App. 2017) (explaining contempt findings are reviewable only by special action), Husband does not challenge the superior court’s finding t

¶23 One such exception is that the superior court retains jurisdiction pending an appeal to take such action as might be necessary to “enforce its previously entered judgment.” ¶ 27 (App. 2017).

“A court abuses its discretion when its ruling is manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.” ¶ 31 (App. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

NIBLEY v. HILLE Decision of the Court 585, ¶ 7 (App. 2017) (reviewing appeal as a special action because contempt findings are only reviewable by special action); ¶ 35 (App. 2001

¶ 13 (App. 2017) (arguments raised for the first time on appeal usually are waived).

¶ 13 (App. 2017) (an argument raised for the first time on appeal is waived).

¶ 29 (App. 2017) (finding no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial where appellant “has not explained how the outcomes of the proceedings would have been any different”).

¶ 13 (App. 2017) (arguments raised for the first time on appeal are normally waived).

¶ 31 (App. 2017) (quotation omitted).

We treat the appeal as a special action regarding the contempt issue, ¶ 7 (App. 2017) (reviewing appeal as a special action because contempt findings are only reviewable by special action), and we remand for reconsideration and a ruling on the contempt petition.

“We review a trial court’s contempt finding and imposition of sanctions for an abuse of discretion.” ____, ¶ 16 (App. 2017).