Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Files v. Bernal, 22 P.3d 57.

100 citing documents.

Nina Alley v. Pima County, Pima County Attorney's Office, Laura Conover Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Nunez v. Valente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
The superior court also abuses its discretion when “the record fails to provide substantial support for [its] decision.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001).
State v. Boisvert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Boisvert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Rynn v. Avondale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Rynn v. Avondale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“If the superior court declines jurisdiction of the special action and does not rule on the merits, we determine only whether the court abused its discretion in declining jurisdiction.”
State v. Leota 538 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Leota 538 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 3 (App. 2004); ¶ 2 (App. 2001).
State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Generally, a court abuses its discretion where the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision or the court commits an error of law in reaching the decision.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001) (citations omitted).
McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“We conduct a bifurcated review of an appeal taken from a non-statutory special action initiated in the superior court.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001) ().
Portillo-Diaz v. shinn/centurion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Portillo-Diaz v. shinn/centurion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Saad v. Shinohara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Saad v. Shinohara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
The superior court abuses its discretion when “the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001).
Shinn v. Merkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Shinn v. Merkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
When the superior court declines to accept special action jurisdiction and thus, “does not rule on the merits, we determine only whether the court abused its discretion in declining jurisdiction.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001).
Charlson v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Charlson v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 3 (App. 2004) (“Generally, a court abuses its discretion where the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision[.]”) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2001)).
Conroy v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Conroy v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
When a superior court rules on the merits of the complaint, “we determine whether it abused its discretion in granting or denying special action relief.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001).
Claxton v. Aboec Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Claxton v. Aboec Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2 (App. 2001); Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
Yokois v. Adc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Yokois v. Adc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Since we “will uphold a denial of special action relief if our review reveals any valid reason for so doing,” Carrington v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, ¶ 6 (App. 2000), and because our thorough review of the record reveals no error of law, ¶ 2 (App. 2001), we conclude Yokois was not denied access to the courts.3 CONCLUSION ¶19 We affirm the superior court’s order declining relief on Yokois’ special action petition.
Swvp-Gts Mr v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Swvp-Gts Mr v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Pritchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Pritchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shadid v. State 421 P.3d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Shadid v. State 421 P.3d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Brailsford v. Foster 393 P.3d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brailsford v. Foster 393 P.3d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
White v. anderson/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
White v. anderson/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ishak v. McClennen Ex Rel. County of Maricopa 388 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ishak v. McClennen Ex Rel. County of Maricopa 388 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal Chopra 387 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal Chopra 387 P.3d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Coombs v. Maricopa County Special Health Care District 387 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Coombs v. Maricopa County Special Health Care District 387 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Clark, 131 Ariz. at 555; ¶ 2 (App. 2001).
Merrick v. Escapule Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Merrick v. Escapule Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 4 (App. 2013); ¶ 2 (App. 2001) (“If the superior court declines jurisdiction of the special action and does not rule on the merits, we determine only whether the court abused its discretion in declining jurisdiction.”).
Gee v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Gee v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dema v. Atonna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dema v. Atonna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“Generally, a court abuses its discretion where the record fails to provide substantial support for its decision or the court commits an error of law in reaching the decision.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001).