Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hobson v. Mid-Century Insurance, 19 P.3d 1241.

80 citing documents.

Gregorwicz v. Villa-Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Stephanie S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stephanie S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Chalker v. Chalker 430 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Chalker v. Chalker 430 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
SPQR Venture, Inc. v. Robertson 349 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
SPQR Venture, Inc. v. Robertson 349 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Reyes 307 P.3d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Reyes 307 P.3d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Co., ¶ 8 , ), we first look to the language of the statute.
State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang Wang 286 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang Wang 286 P.3d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting Project Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
City of Sierra Vista v. Sierra Vista Wards System Voting Project Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re the Marriage of Priessman 266 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In Re the Marriage of Priessman 266 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. City of Glendale 253 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. City of Glendale 253 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSB 253 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSB 253 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Mark Dwayne Gannon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Mark Dwayne Gannon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Lee v. Industrial Commission 212 P.3d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Lee v. Industrial Commission 212 P.3d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Jeffery Harris v. City of Bisbee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Jeffery Harris v. City of Bisbee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., (appeals court bound by supreme court’s interpretation of statute).
State v. Guadagni 178 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Guadagni 178 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., , , *5 1245 (App.2001).
Banner Health v. Medical Savings Insurance 163 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Reinstein 150 P.3d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Reinstein 150 P.3d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Guerra v. Bejarano 133 P.3d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Guerra v. Bejarano 133 P.3d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Co., ¶20 , (“When, as here, the legislature has clearly spoken by statute on a substantive matter within its domain, the courts will not interfere, under the guise of its equitable powers, with proper application of such statute.”); see also Guzman, 175 Ariz. at 188 , 854 P.2d at 1174 (h
JOHN C. v. Sargeant 90 P.3d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
JOHN C. v. Sargeant 90 P.3d 781 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Brown 85 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Lawrence Brown, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
In re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH 2003-000058 84 P.3d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Brown 85 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
In re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH 2003-000058 84 P.3d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Co., ¶ 8 , (stating that if language is ambiguous, “we then consider other factors such as the statute’s context, subject matter, historical background, effects, consequences, spirit, and purpose”).
State of Arizona v. Lawrence Brown, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 78 P.3d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 78 P.3d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66 v. State 74 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66 v. State 74 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., , 528 ¶ 6, (review de novo issues of statutory interpretation and constitutionality); Ariz. Dep’t of Pub.
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003