Cited by

138 (); see also Aranda, 198 Ariz. at 470 ¶ 12 (explaining a procedural law “relates to the manner and means by which a right to recover is enforced or provides no more than the method by which to proceed”); (“[T]he methods of perfecting and processing such rights are procedural.”); (“[T]he adjective, remedial or procedural law is that which prescribes the method of enforcing the right or obtaining redress for its invasion.

Our supreme court has clarified that a substantive law “creates, defines and regulates rights,” whereas a procedural law “prescribes the method of enforcing the right or obtaining redress[.]”

¶ 13 (2020) (describing procedural law as pertaining to and prescribing “the practice, method, procedure or legal machinery by which the substantive law is enforced or made effective” ()).

1(a) (“Special forms and proceedings for these writs are replaced by the special action provided by this Rule, and designation of the proceedings as certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition is neither necessary nor proper.”); (“We now are of the opinion that[,] while the right to appeal [under A.R.S.

see also Seisinger, 220 Ariz. at 92 ¶ 29.

(quoting State v. Birmingham , , 110, ).

¶ 11 (App. 2011) (); ¶ 3 (App. 2000).

See Arizona Revised Statute (“A.R.S.”) section 13-4032(2) (appellate court has jurisdiction over an appeal by the State from a grant of a motion for new trial); (same).

review” within the meaning of § 12-902(A)(1).5 That year, an amendment to § 28-451 changed some language concerning implied consent appeals and exempted some newly enacted procedural provisions of § 12-910 of the ARA, 316, 107 (1964) (characterizing appeal as special proceeding commenced in superior court), modified on reh’g, -78 (1964), with Sarwark, 123 Ariz. at 3, 596 P.2d at 1175 (emphasizing administrative decisions not subject to review under statute allowing appeals “in an action or speci

To qualify as appealable, an order entered after final judgment must “dispose[ ] of or settle[ ] ultimate rights.”

¶ 29, the court stated, “The ultimate question is whether the statute enacts, at least in relevant part, law that effectively „creates, defines, and regulates rights,‟” id.

¶ 12 “[SJubstantive law is that part of the law which creates, defines and regulates rights.”

Fowler, 156 Ariz. at 411-12 , 752 P.2d at 500 -01 ( , ).

¶ 20 Substantive law “creates and defines rights,” while “procedural law prescribes the method by which a substantive law is enforced or made effective.” , , (“[Substantive law ...

¶ 20 The Arizona legislature is charged with the responsibility for enacting substantive law that “creates, defines and regulates rights.”

State v. Birmingham, 96 Ariz. 109, 112