Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Birmingham, 392 P.2d 775.

175 citing documents.

Zoellner v. Zoellner 422 P.2d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance 422 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1966
Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance 422 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1966
§ 12-109; 17 A.R.S., Rule 47(b) ; , .
Gabriel Ex Rel. Gabriel v. Murphy 421 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Gabriel Ex Rel. Gabriel v. Murphy 421 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
City of Tucson v. Wondergem 419 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
City of Tucson v. Wondergem 419 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. *292 Birmingham, , ; Blackman v. Associates Loan Co., 1 Ariz.App.
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 419 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 419 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Decker v. City of Tucson 419 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Decker v. City of Tucson 419 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Chmielewski v. Chmielewski 419 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Chmielewski v. Chmielewski 419 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Hackin v. Superior Court 419 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Hackin v. Superior Court 419 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
There is a series of cases in both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals, , which point out that the first two sentences of the above mentioned rules require not only that the order be appealable, but that it must be in proper appealable form.
Pegler v. Sullivan 418 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Anonymous v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Pegler v. Sullivan 418 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Blackman v. Associates Loan Company, 1 Ariz.App.
Anonymous v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Associates Finance Corporation v. Scott 411 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Associates Finance Corporation v. Scott 411 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
§ 12-2101; Rule 58(a) R.Civ.P.
Patch v. Buros 410 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Patch v. Buros 410 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
which case was decided on 4 June 1964.
Blackman v. Associates Loan Co. 398 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Blackman v. Associates Loan Co. 398 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In State v. Birmingham, (1964) , , the law is laid down as .