Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Birmingham, 392 P.2d 775.

175 citing documents.

Farmers Ins. Co. of Ariz. v. Vagnozzi 644 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
There are latent ambiguities inherent in the principle that under our law a “judgment” is not only a plenary adjudication of rights and issues but is also an appealable order, , including an order denying a motion for new trial.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Actions Nos. J-86384 & JS-2605 594 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Actions Nos. J-86384 & JS-2605 594 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Since no written order has been entered herein, and since only written orders signed by a judge and filed with the clerk are appealable, Rule 58(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure; , no valid appeal has been perfected herein, and this court is without jurisdiction except to dismiss the attempted appeal.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S 594 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S 594 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
§ 12-2101(C); Young Mines Co. v. Blackburn, supra
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. Jt-180844 569 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. Jt-180844 569 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-834, supra.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Arizona Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. Stewart Title & Trust 531 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Arizona Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. Stewart Title & Trust 531 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Yaeger v. Vance 513 P.2d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Yaeger v. Vance 513 P.2d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Zoellner v. Zoellner, 4 Ariz.App.
Reid v. Reid 511 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Reid v. Reid 511 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation 511 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation 511 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
The Supreme Court, , aptly defines “judgment” as follows: “Rule 54(a), adopted in 1939, provides that the term ‘judgment’ as used in the Civil Rules of Procedure includes decrees and orders from which an appeal lies.
Wolf Corporation v. Louis 464 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Wolf Corporation v. Louis 464 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Transport Workers Union, Local 502 v. Tucson Airport Authority, Inc. 464 P.2d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Transport Workers Union, Local 502 v. Tucson Airport Authority, Inc. 464 P.2d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Tessitore v. McGilvra 459 P.2d 716 Ariz. 1969
Tessitore v. McGilvra 459 P.2d 716 Ariz. 1969
Industrial Commission v. Cameron 447 P.2d 871 Ariz. 1968
Industrial Commission v. Cameron 447 P.2d 871 Ariz. 1968
suggests the rationale for the above conclusion.
Webb v. Dixon 447 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Webb v. Dixon 447 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
If we are in error in so regarding this decision of our Supreme Court
Heeter v. Moore Drug Co. 440 P.2d 680 Ariz. 1968
Heeter v. Moore Drug Co. 440 P.2d 680 Ariz. 1968
Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan Association 433 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan Association 433 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Rule 58(a), R.C.P.; , City of Tucson v. Wondergem, 4 Ariz.App.
O'Brien v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa Co. 435 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1967
O'Brien v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa Co. 435 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1967
Alternative Writ the court stated: ■ ' “* * * JOSEPH T. O’BRIEN is-not competent to serve or to be appointed’ as administrator of the estate of the deceased because of improvidence, want of understanding and integrity.” , we held that orders and judgments made appealable under 4 A.R.S.
Montalvo v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company 427 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Montalvo v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company 427 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 427 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 427 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Rule 54(a) and amended Rule 58(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.; , ; Blackman v. Associates Loan Company, 1 Ariz.App.
Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp. 426 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1967
Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp. 426 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1967
The minute entry order denying a motion for new trial is not an appealable order because it was not signed by the judge and filed with the clerk of the court, , , and the notice of appeal from the minute entry order was ineffective to confer jurisdiction to consider the merits of the appeal.
Sahlin v. AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PA. 423 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Sahlin v. AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PA. 423 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Although our Supreme Court has stated that an order granting a motion setting aside a default judgment is an appealable order ( , [1963]), which presumably must be reduced to written form before it can be effective and an appeal taken therefrom ( , [1964]), our Supreme Court has also ruled that an order denying a motion to set aside default was not a “final judgment” and therefore “not appealable”.
Kenyon v. Kenyon 425 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Kenyon v. Kenyon 425 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris, 4 Ariz.App.
Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Company 423 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Company 423 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Zoellner v. Zoellner 422 P.2d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by