Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hickman, 68 P.3d 418.

108 citing documents.

State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986) (delineating limits to the “automatic reversal rule” that accompanies certain types of error); ¶ 29 , (“Virtually any error, under particular circumstances, can be harmless.”) ( ¶ 21 , ).
State v. Whitley 85 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Whitley 85 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
¶ 29 , ( ¶ 21 , (McGregor, J., dissenting)).
State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
(holding that Huerta and the long line of Arizona cases upon which it relied “no longer remain[] authoritative”).
State v. Ibanez 72 P.3d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Ibanez 72 P.3d 354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
overruling Huerta’s automatic-reversal rule.
Galloway v. Vanderpool 69 P.3d 23 Ariz. 2003