Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Newell, 132 P.3d 833.

558 citing documents.

State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fortune Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fortune Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Haslock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Haslock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 34 (2006), which held that an appellate court may review suppression arguments first raised on appeal for fundamental error, controls our review of this issue.
State v. Womble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Womble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶18 The race-neutral explanation need not be “persuasive, or even plausible.” ¶ 54 (2006) (quoting Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768 (1995)).
State v. Palmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Palmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 34 (2006); (“Issues concerning the suppression of evidence which were not raised in the trial court are waived on appeal.”).
State v. Sutter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sutter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Ibarra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Ibarra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 68 (2006) (noting that juries are presumed to follow the court’s instructions).
State v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“A confession is prima facie involuntary and the state must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the confession was freely and voluntarily made.” ¶ 39 (2006) (citation omitted).
State v. Gaxiola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Allee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Allee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
No curative instruction was requested or necessary, particularly in light of the court’s instructions that the jury must disregard any answer when an objection is sustained; “[w]e presume that the jurors followed the court’s instructions.” ¶ 68 (2006).
State v. Gaxiola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
3 ¶ 22 (2006); (outlining procedures for the trial court in conducting an evidentiary hearing when a pretrial identification is challenged).
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Grier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Grier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gipson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gipson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 70 (2006) (“When considered in the context of the entire trial, we agree that the overwhelming evidence of guilt influenced the jury to convict,” rather than the verdict resulting from the prosecutor’s misconduct).
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶15 The trial court’s ultimate finding is entitled to great deference, Hernandez, 500 U.S. at 366–69 (plurality opinion), and we will not reverse the denial of a Batson challenge absent clear error, ¶ 52 (2006).
State v. Hester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The defendant must show that there is a “reasonable likelihood” that the “misconduct could have affected the jury’s verdict.” ¶ 67 (2006) (quoting Atwood, 171 Ariz. at 606).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson Ariz. 2019
¶ 68 (2006) (stating “[w]e presume that .
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 62 (2006) (there are two types of vouching, placing the prestige of the government behind evidence and suggesting information not before the court supports the evidence).
State v. Meiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Meiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lincourt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019