Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1743 citing documents.

State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Meeds 421 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Francois Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Francois Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Meeds 421 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Calderon-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Calderon-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining that fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19 (2005) (citation omitted).
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 19 (2005); (fundamental error review when defendant failed to challenge aggravating factor at sentencing).
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Todd 418 P.3d 1147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Todd 418 P.3d 1147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See State v. Henderson , , ¶ 18
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Valles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Valles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 20 (2005) (requiring defendant to establish error and prejudice in fundamental error review).
State v. Wheeler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wheeler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, the Administrative Order did not apply to the issued bench warrant, id., and the assessment of the warrant fee constitutes fundamental error, ¶ 19 (2005) (explaining that when a defendant fails to object to an error, this court reviews for fundamental error); Soria, 217 Ariz. at 102-03, ¶¶ 4, 7 (“[I]mposition of an illegal sentence constitutes fundamental error.”).
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Franklin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 19-20 (2005) (explaining fundamental error is error that both goes to the foundation of the case and prejudices the defendant).
State v. Franklin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sotelo-Nava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sotelo-Nava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 19 (2005) (explaining that failure to object to alleged trial error results in fundamental error review).
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McCollum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McCollum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Puente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Puente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State of Arizona v. Bryan Wayne Hulsey Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Bryan Wayne Hulsey Ariz. 2018
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Weber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Weber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Risner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Risner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017