Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1723 citing documents.

State v. Democker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Democker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ceasar 383 P.3d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ceasar 383 P.3d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 20 (2005) (citations omitted).
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 9 (App. 2011) ( ¶ 19 (2005)).
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Linares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Boudreau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garwo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Salinas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Salinas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garwo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Linares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Boudreau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Moraga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Moraga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian Gunches 377 P.3d 993 Ariz. 2016
State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian Gunches 377 P.3d 993 Ariz. 2016
¶ 23, (under fundamental error standard of review, defendant “must first prove error”).
State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey 381 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern Burbey 381 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Barlow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-69, ¶¶ 19-26, -09 (2005).
State v. Barlow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
To demonstrate that an error was harmless, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error in admitting the evidence “did not contribute to or affect the verdict or sentence.” ¶ 18 (2005).
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, (citations omitted).
State of Arizona v. Summer Lynn Leon 381 P.3d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Summer Lynn Leon 381 P.3d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
¶ 13; ¶¶ 19-20, (fundamental error review applies to constitutional claims first raised on appeal).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Long Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶6 “To prevail under th[e] standard of review [for fundamental error], a defendant must establish both that fundamental error exists and that the error in his case caused him prejudice.” ¶ 20
State of Arizona v. Julio Pedroza-Perez 377 P.3d 311 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Julio Pedroza-Perez 377 P.3d 311 Ariz. 2016
In other words, structural errors are those that “affect the entire conduct of the trial from beginning to end, and thus taint the framework within which the trial proceeds.” ¶ 12, (internal quotation marks omitted) ( ¶ 22, ).
State v. Clayborn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Apodaca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Strait Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Apodaca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clayborn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016