Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1743 citing documents.

State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Erivez 341 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Tomlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Tomlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Erivez 341 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“To prevail under this standard of review, a defendant must establish both that fundamental error exists and that the error in his case caused him prejudice.” ¶ 20
State v. Costa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Costa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
–68, ¶¶ 11–22, –08 (2005).
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Raimonde Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Raimonde Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ketchner 339 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Darrell Bryant Ketchner Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Darrell Bryant Ketchner Ariz. 2014
State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 19, (stating fundamental error review “applies when a defendant fails to object to alleged trial error”).
State v. Ketchner 339 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2014
State v. Solis 339 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Leibly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Solis 339 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See, ¶ 18, ¶ 45, Bible, 175 Ariz. at 588, 858 P.2d at 1191.
State v. Leibly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Coulter 339 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Centeno-Sarabia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Centeno-Sarabia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Coulter 339 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Boutsisavanh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sherri C. v. Dcs, T.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Boutsisavanh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sherri C. v. Dcs, T.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 19, see also Monica C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, (internal quotations and citations omitted).
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 19, (failure to object to alleged trial error limits defendant to fundamental error review on appeal).
State of Arizona v. Javier Solis 338 P.3d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Javier Solis 338 P.3d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
“Fundamental error is ‘error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.’” Id.
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
¶¶ 19-20 , (failure to raise claim in trial court constitutes forfeiture of claim absent fundamental and prejudicial error); , (failure to allege fundamental error waives claim on appeal).
State v. Talibuddin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Talibuddin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014