Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1723 citing documents.

State v. Leibly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Solis 339 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See, ¶ 18, ¶ 45, Bible, 175 Ariz. at 588, 858 P.2d at 1191.
State v. Leibly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Coulter 339 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Centeno-Sarabia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Centeno-Sarabia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Coulter 339 P.3d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lewis 340 P.3d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Boutsisavanh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sherri C. v. Dcs, T.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Boutsisavanh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sherri C. v. Dcs, T.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 19, see also Monica C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19, (internal quotations and citations omitted).
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 19, (failure to object to alleged trial error limits defendant to fundamental error review on appeal).
State of Arizona v. Javier Solis 338 P.3d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Javier Solis 338 P.3d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
“Fundamental error is ‘error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.’” Id.
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Welch 340 P.3d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
¶¶ 19-20 , (failure to raise claim in trial court constitutes forfeiture of claim absent fundamental and prejudicial error); , (failure to allege fundamental error waives claim on appeal).
State v. Talibuddin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Talibuddin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Ross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sovine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sovine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Garcia 334 P.3d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Garcia 334 P.3d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶¶ 19–20, Ariz. R. Crim.
State of Arizona v. Sergio Arturo Rojo-Valenzuela 334 P.3d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Sergio Arturo Rojo-Valenzuela 334 P.3d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Benson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Benson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Yazzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Alvarez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Yazzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
And, thus we will provide appellate relief only if the “error [is] of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 19
State v. Cravets Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014