Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henderson, 115 P.3d 601.

1723 citing documents.

In Re Mh2010-002637 263 P.3d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Flores 260 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Flores 260 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Fundamental error is “ ‘error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.’” ¶ 19, ( , ).
State v. Kemper 258 P.3d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Kemper 258 P.3d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Gray 258 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Gray 258 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Trujillo 257 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Trujillo 257 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Bigger 254 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Bigger 254 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
State v. Dixon 250 P.3d 1174 Ariz. 2011
State v. Dixon 250 P.3d 1174 Ariz. 2011
State v. Prince 250 P.3d 1145 Ariz. 2011
See State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, 567 ¶ 19
State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011
State v. Delahanty 250 P.3d 1131 Ariz. 2011
Because Delahanty did not object below, he must show “both that fundamental error exists and that the error in his case caused him prejudice.” ¶ 20
State of Arizona v. Della Lisa Vermuele Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Della Lisa Vermuele Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Abdi 248 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Abdi 248 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Michelle D. Sprang Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Michelle D. Sprang Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Bunting 246 P.3d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Bunting 246 P.3d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Martinez 245 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Martinez 245 P.3d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State of Arizona v. Jaren Scott Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Jaren Scott Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Herrera 243 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Herrera 243 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. James Charles Ray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. James Charles Ray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. James A. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State of Arizona v. James A. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
See State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, ¶¶ 19-20
State v. Kinney 241 P.3d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Kinney 241 P.3d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
¶¶ 19-20 , (failure to object to alleged error in trial court results in forfeiture of review for all but fundamental error).
State v. Mason 238 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Mason 238 P.3d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
State v. Rios 237 P.3d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Rios 237 P.3d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bob H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC. 237 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bob H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC. 237 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Don Chappell 236 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2010
State v. Martin 235 P.3d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Martin 235 P.3d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Don Chappell 236 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2010
-68 ¶¶ 19-20, -08 (2005).
State v. Hargrave 234 P.3d 569 Ariz. 2010

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by